en
English
Joint Research Centre
Menu
FAIRMODE
Close
Menu
Back
Home
Activities
WG1
– Source apportionment to support AQ management
WG2
– QA/QC of AQ assessment applications
WG3
– Quality control indicators for AQ forecasts
WG4
– Microscale assessment
WG5
– Planning
WG6
–Sensors and data-fusion
WG7
– High resolution emission inventories
WG8
– Monitoring design, spat. rep. and exceed. indicators
Meetings
Next Meeting
2023-2024
2021-2022
2019-2020
2017-2018
2015-2016
2013-2014
2011-2012
2009-2010
2007-2008
About
Terms of Reference
Steering Committee
National Experts
Roadmap
Strategy
Forum
Guidance
Assessment
Planning
Tools
Δ - Delta Benchmarking
SHERPA
ECMap
Join FAIRMODE
Home
…
About the European Commission
EC Science Hub
FAIRMODE
Past Meeting
2017-06-19
19-22
Jun
2017
Technical meeting
Athens-GR
Agenda
Minutes
Presentations
Meeting introduction
P. Thunis
Composite Mapping
Composite Mapping: Introduction
S. Janssen
Composite Mapping: CMAP/CEMAP tool on compliance to the standards for Fairmode composite mapping
C. Cuvelier
Composite Mapping: Concentration Version 2
P. Viaene
Composite Mapping: Emission mapping exercise
M. Guevara
Composite Mapping: Emission mapping exercise: Hands-on session
M. Guevara
Pilot Exercise
Pilot Exercise: Introduction
E. Pisoni
Pilot Exercise: Milan
M. Bedogni
Pilot Exercise: Dublin/Ireland
K. Delaney
Pilot Exercise: Krakow/Malopolska
P. Durka
Pilot Exercise: Stockholm/Sweden
M. Ross Jones
Pilot Exercise: Sweden
K. Eneroth
Pilot Exercise: Emilia Romagna
M. Stortini
Pilot Exercise: Croatia
S. Vidic
Pilot Exercise: Slovenia
R. Zabkar
Planning & source apportionment
Source apportionment and Planning: When & what is fit for purpose?
A. Clappier
Planning & Source apportionment
C. Belis
Towards FAIRMODE recommendations
Guidance & Recommendations: Introduction
P. Thunis
Guidance & Recommendations: WG1
S. Janssen
Guidance & Recommendations: WG2
L. Tarrason
Guidance & Recommendations: WG4
A. Clappier
SHERPA session
SHERPA: Modelling city specific situations
E. Pisoni
SHERPA: testing the SHERPA tool to support air quality plans over portugal
A. Monteiro
SHERPA: Discussion
E. Pisoni
SHERPA: Use of the SHERPA tool in Spain
F. Martin
SHERPA: SHERPA Evaluation
P. Thunis
Towards spatial source apportionment
Spatial source apportionment: Introduction
C. Belis
Spatial source apportionment: On the validity of the incremental approach to calculate the impact of cities on air quality
P. Thunis
Spatial source apportionment: Application of PMF analysis for assessing the intra and inter-city variability of emission source chemical profiles
E. Diapouli
Spatial source apportionment: Danube area: Geographic origin of pollutants using FLEXPART
S. Vratolis
Spatial Source Apportionment A case study for the Milan urban area
G. Pirovano
WG1 - Assessment
Exceedance modelling & fit for purpose
S. Janssen
Exceedance modelling: Data fusion mapping under ETC/ACM
J. Horalek
Exceedance modelling: Discussion
B. Maiheu
Exceedance modelling & exposure
S. Nordmann
Exceedance modelling: Model's fitness for purpose
J. Stocker
Forecast: DELTA tool 5.5 - forecast mode Poland
P. Durka
Forecast: Probability estimate for forecast exceedances
B. Maiheu
Forecast: Evaluation of DELTA forecasting MQO V5.5
J. Stocker
High Percentiles: MQO for percentiles
J. Horalek
High Percentiles: Evaluation of DELTA MPI for high percentiles
J. Stocker
High Percentiles: Evaluation of DELTA MPI for high percentiles
J. Stocker
WG2 - Emissions
The importance of evaluation of local traffic emission factors
M. Guevara
Emission inventories in Malopolska/Krakow
P. Durka
Pilot Stockholm
K. Eneroth
Spatio-temporal distribution of anthropogenic and biogenic emissions over Greece - A GIS approach
K. Fameli
Alternative approach to estimate and distribute national traffic emissions at high spatial resolution
S. Lopes-Aparicio
On the road to improve the emission inventory over Portugal
A. Monteiro
Evaluation of wood-burningemissionin Norwegian cities
L. Tarrason
Spatial inter-comparison of emission inventories and its importance for air quality modelling activities
M. Trombetti
FAIRMODE management practices at Slovenian Environment Agency Part II: Emissions
R. Zabkar
WG3 - Source Apportionment
Source Oriented Models - Performance Evaluation
G. Pirovano
Source apportionment inter-comparison exercise 2015-2016 part 1 RM
C. Belis
Source apportionment inter-comparison exercise 2015-2016 part 2 CTM
C. Belis
Source apportionment inter-comparison exercise 2015-2016 part 3 RM & CTM
C. Belis
Simulating the photochemical pollution above the Greater Athens Area and Ozone source apportionment during an air quality episode with the MM5/CAMx model
V. Assimakopoulos
Source Apportionment Survey and Guide: current status and open questions
M. Mircea
Source apportioment of air pollutants – German practice
S. Nordmann
WG3 topics SPECIEUROPE DELTASA CEN Training
C. Belis
Workshop on Spatial representativeness
Introduction & Scope of the Intercomparison Exercise
O. Kracht
Status of the Intercomparison Exercise
O. Kracht
Spatial Representativeness & Harmonization – Do we need a paradigm shift?
O. Kracht
Spatial Representativness: to do list
O. Kracht
Intercomparison Exercise of Spatial Representativeness Methods
K. Eneroth
FAIRMODE SPATIAL REPRESENTATIVENESS: ANTWERP DATASET
H. Hooyberghs
Spatial representativeness method proposed for the Walloon monitoring stations applied to the Antwerp dataset
F. Lenartz
Spatial representativeness: French Contribution
L. Malherbe
Intercomparison exercise: CIEMAT results
F. Martin
Intercomparison exercise: RIVM results
L. Nguyen
Intercomparison exercise: UmweltBundesamt results
W. Spangl
Intercomparison exercise: ENEA results
S. Piersanti
Intercomparison exercise: VMM results
D. Roet
Intercomparison exercise: RIO Methodology
P. Viaene
Spatial Representativeness Intercomparsion: Irish feedback
K. Delaney
Recent Activities & Revised Approaches
Recommendations
About FAIRMODE
Terms of Reference
Steering committee
National Experts
Roadmap
Strategy
Forum
Guidance
Assessment
Planning
Tools
Δ - Delta Benchmarking
SHERPA
EC Map (2024)
EC MAP (2017)
ECMap - Database
